Born on this Date
Rep. Kenneth C. Hulshof (R-MO)

Born: May 22, 1958
Age: 54

 Newsletter

To be informed of important news about our site, enter your email here. You can always unsubscribe later. Your address will not be released to others. (Read our Privacy Policy)

 LegiStorm Blog
 IN THE NEWS
 FOLLOW US
Icon-facebook

Icon-twitter

Ic-salaries House Salaries and Bonuses by Member


Rank Member Status First 3 Quarters (Averaged) Fourth Quarter 4th Quarter Increase
Quarterly Payroll Questioniconlarge01 Avg. Salary Questioniconlarge01 Quarterly Payroll Questioniconlarge01 Avg. Salary Questioniconlarge01 Payroll $ Questioniconlarge01 Salary % Questioniconlarge01
1 Moran, Rep. Jim (-VA) In Office $200,802 $12,160 $427,999 $26,750 $+227,197 119.98%
2 Lankford, Rep. James (-OK) In Office $182,982 $11,195 $287,953 $18,630 $+104,971 66.41%
3 Boren, Rep. Dan (-OK) In Office $245,467 $13,286 $395,945 $22,010 $+150,479 65.67%
4 Nunes, Rep. Devin (-CA) In Office $232,198 $14,859 $382,969 $24,017 $+150,771 61.63%
5 Thompson, Rep. Mike (-CA) In Office $260,826 $15,182 $420,893 $24,277 $+160,067 59.9%
6 Andrews, Rep. Rob (-NJ) In Office $175,342 $11,709 $242,857 $18,329 $+67,515 56.53%
7 Carnahan, Rep. Russ (-MO) In Office $219,749 $13,217 $330,613 $20,663 $+110,863 56.34%
8 Landry, Rep. Jeff (-LA) In Office $169,189 $12,366 $295,640 $19,331 $+126,451 56.32%
9 Alexander, Rep. Rodney (-LA) In Office $221,281 $11,123 $337,958 $16,898 $+116,677 51.92%
10 McCarthy, Rep. Carolyn Cook (-NY) In Office $226,119 $13,508 $319,493 $19,968 $+93,374 47.83%
11 Burgess, Rep. Michael (-TX) In Office $235,422 $12,704 $319,254 $18,780 $+83,832 47.82%
12 Matheson, Rep. Jim (-UT) In Office $204,381 $13,098 $321,450 $19,279 $+117,069 47.19%
13 Stark, Rep. Pete (-CA) In Office $243,715 $15,740 $330,325 $23,040 $+86,610 46.38%
14 Lewis, Rep. Jerry (-CA) In Office $280,226 $19,178 $389,899 $27,850 $+109,673 45.22%
15 Boswell, Rep. Leonard (-IA) In Office $220,222 $13,776 $326,203 $19,653 $+105,981 42.66%
16 Cohen, Rep. Steve (-TN) In Office $240,727 $11,552 $333,535 $16,400 $+92,808 41.97%
17 King, Rep. Steve (-IA) In Office $220,678 $11,937 $279,800 $16,913 $+59,122 41.69%
18 Tonko, Rep. Paul (-NY) In Office $221,305 $14,256 $297,660 $20,165 $+76,355 41.45%
19 Gutiérrez, Rep. Luis (-IL) In Office $240,176 $13,439 $335,000 $18,781 $+94,824 39.75%
20 Ryan, Rep. Tim (-OH) In Office $245,577 $13,815 $372,915 $19,285 $+127,338 39.6%
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next Last
436 results

This chart provides a member-by-member list of end-of-year bonuses paid to staff. Because officially released data does not report bonuses as such, we have estimated the size of the bonuses by comparing the average quarterly salary payments in the first three quarters of the year with the quarterly salary payments in the final quarter.


The numbers are reported both in absolute dollar figures for the whole office and as a percentage increase in an average staffer's pay. Both of these numbers tell slightly different stories. The overall dollar figure does not take into account how many people are working in the office. The salary percentage increase, on the other hand, attempts to minimize any distortions caused by an exodus of staffers or a wave of new hires by pro-rating the salary amounts. The percentage represents the amount that the average staffer's pay increased from the first three quarters to the fourth quarter.


No results are shown for any members who did not serve the entire year.


For more detail on how the numbers were obtained for each column, place your mouse over the Questioniconlarge01 symbol in the column heading.


Comments

Flag comment
as inappropriate
by anonymous on 01/29/2012 08:00 AM EST
It is such insanity. Maybe we need to move congress to Montana, or Kentucky or any state that the cost of living is less. Iowa or Nebraska so they could be in the middle of the country to lower the cost of travel to home states. What are we thinking for cripes sakes. It is time for a change!
by anonymous on 12/31/2011 05:16 PM EST
Hello!!! These are the payroll numbers for staff, not the legislators' salaries. Breathe for cripe's sake! Say each had10 people on staff, that's about20 k per quarter per person. Divide that by 3 and get a little over 6k per month or about 70k per staffer annually. In DC that is chump party.
by anonymous on 06/29/2011 02:56 PM EDT
Ah, these are quarterly salaries... so it is even more obscene than you think!
by Steve on 05/29/2011 11:11 AM EDT
Rep Brown-Waite's average yearly salary including bonus comes to around $70K average using these figures, yes? That isn't anything special if you consider the cost to live in the DC area. Rep Kosmas has an average yearly salary including bonus of around $55K, meaning that even with the bonus, on the average no one is living extravagantly at all. To me, the data would be more powerful if it showed individual bonus extremes rather than the averages across all staff. As a person living in the DC area, I am not at all impressed with these salaries.
by John Benton on 05/01/2011 02:33 PM EDT
This is obscene!! When are we going to stand up and end this nonsense! Enough is enough. The biggest "entitlement" program we have is our congress. Ever since 1989 when congress voted itself automatic pay raises, their salaries have nearly doubled. Mind you, more than half of the members of congress are already multi-millionaires and yet they receive salaries anywhere from 174k to 223k, not to mention the staff budgets for each and the pensions and other benefits. How the hell they can have the nerve to call themselves "public servants" is a joke! We can solve most of our budget problems by reforming this corrupt body alone. I dont care if you are a R or a D, its time for our "public servants" to put there money where there mouth is. How dare they ask taxpayers to make cuts and strip seniors and others of benefits without doing there fair share is appauling. Cut there pay by 25%, this alone would save in excess of 15 billion dollars and ALL would still be making in excess of 125K per year. We also need to srtip the pensions and lifetime pay to those multi millionaire "public servants" who do not need it. Then they can wrap themselves in the flag and talk about how they care so much for america and the american people. The next thing we need to do is reform the outrageous amounts spent on elections. This is at the core of the corruption and influence that is destroying our democracy.And now with change in the Supreme Court ruling that will only get worse. The solution: Every candidate who runs for national office should be required to contribute $0.25 of every dollar rasied to a fund that pays down the national debt. Given the obsurd amount of money spent in these campaigns, we should have our debt problem handled in no time. Also, as an american, no matter which candidates win, ALL the american people now benefit from the process and hopefuly in some small way, we will get more people in the process who truly care about ALL amerricans and not just a particular party or idealogy. Why is it we only co
by lynn on 03/09/2011 03:54 PM EST
crooks who answer to no one, no accountablity, no shame!!!!!!
by Anne on 03/09/2011 11:39 AM EST
Holy Wisconsin! Legislators really know how to help themselves - too bad they don't help the people whose money they've taken and who could use it so much more. The French Revolutionists and Egyptians know a thing or two more than we do!
Name: (optional)
Registered users can receive email notification of comments placed on this page. Sign in to an existing account or register for a new account.