Two weeks of unlimited access to our valuable
service. See what people are talking about.
LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:
by Chip Slawson on 05/24/2013
by Garrett Snedeker on 04/29/2013
by Garrett Snedeker on 03/25/2013
by Daimon Eklund on 03/12/2013
by Daimon Eklund on 02/21/2013
by BuzzFeed on 05/20/2013Few rules when foreign governments fund Congressional travel
by FOX 13 / WTVT-TV on 05/10/2013Lawmakers' families bring home big perks
by Iowa Watchdog on 05/08/2013Paying the Bills | Hill Navigator
by Roll Call on 05/07/2013
|Release Date:||Revised April 18, 2012|
|Source Agency:||Congressional Research Service|
The multilateral development banks (MDBs) include the World Bank and four smaller regional development banks: the African Development Bank (AfDB), the Asian Development Bank (AsDB), the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD), and the InterAmerican Development Bank (IDB). The United States is a member of, and major donor to, each of the MDBs. The MDBs provide financial assistance to developing countries in order to promote economic and social development. They primarily fund large infrastructure and other development projects and, increasingly, provide loans tied to policy reforms by the government. The MDBs provide nonconcessional financial assistance to middle-income countries and some creditworthy low-income countries on market-based terms. They also provide concessional assistance, including grants and loans at below-market rate interest rates, to low-income countries. Critics argue that the MDBs focus on getting money out the door (rather than delivering results), are not transparent, and lack a clear division of labor. They also argue that providing aid multilaterally relinquishes U.S. control over where and how the money is spent. Proponents argue that providing assistance to developing countries is the right thing to do and has been successful in helping developing countries make strides in health and education over the past four decades. They also argue that MDB assistance is important for leveraging funds from bilateral donors, promoting policy reforms, and enhancing U.S. leadership. The Role of Congress in the MDBs Funding: Congressional legislation is required for the United States to make financial contributions to the MDBs. Appropriations for the concessional windows occur regularly, but appropriations are far more infrequent for the nonconcessional windows. Unusually, all the MDBs are in the process of increasing the size of their non-concessional lending facilities. Congress authorized U.S. contributions to the general capital increases of the non-concessional lending windows in FY2011 for the AsDB and in FY2012 for the other MDBs. The appropriations for these increases are expected to be spread out over a five- to eight-year period, depending on the institution. Oversight: In addition to congressional hearings on the MDBs, Congress exercises oversight over U.S. participation in the MDBs through legislative mandates. These mandates direct the U.S. Executive Directors to the MDBs to advocate certain policies and how to vote on various issues at the MDBs. Congress also issues reporting requirements for the Treasury Department on issues related to MDB activities. Congress can also withhold funding for the MDBs unless certain institutional reforms are met ( power of the purse ). U.S. Commercial Interests: More than $30 billion in contracts are awarded each year to complete projects financed by the MDBs. Some of these contracts are awarded to U.S. companies. The World Bank has been discussing major changes in how companies bid on World Bank projects, and this could be an area for Congress to monitor given U.S. commercial interests in the bank.