Two weeks of unlimited access to our valuable
service. See what people are talking about.
LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:
by Chip Slawson on 05/24/2013
by Garrett Snedeker on 04/29/2013
by Garrett Snedeker on 03/25/2013
by Daimon Eklund on 03/12/2013
by Daimon Eklund on 02/21/2013
by BuzzFeed on 05/20/2013Few rules when foreign governments fund Congressional travel
by FOX 13 / WTVT-TV on 05/10/2013Lawmakers' families bring home big perks
by Iowa Watchdog on 05/08/2013Paying the Bills | Hill Navigator
by Roll Call on 05/07/2013
|Release Date:||Revised Dec. 20, 2012|
|Source Agency:||Congressional Research Service|
Congress has a long-standing interest in seeing that immigration enforcement agencies identify and deport criminal aliens. The expeditious removal of such aliens has been a statutory priority since 1986, and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and its predecessor agency have operated programs targeting criminal aliens for removal since 1988. These programs have grown substantially since FY2005. Despite the interest in criminal aliens, inconsistencies in data quality, data collection, and definitions make it impossible to precisely enumerate the criminal alien population, defined in this report as all noncitizens ever convicted of a crime. CRS estimates the number of noncitizens incarcerated in federal and state prisons and local jails a subset of all criminal aliens at 173,000 in 2009 (the most recent year for which complete data are available), with state prisons and local jails each accounting for somewhat more incarcerations than federal prisons. The overall proportion of noncitizens in federal and state prisons and local jails corresponds closely to the proportion of noncitizens in the total U.S. population. DHS operates four programs designed in whole or in part to target criminal aliens: the Criminal Alien Program (CAP), Secure Communities, the 287(g) program, and the National Fugitive Operations Program (NFOP). The CAP, Secure Communities, and certain 287(g) programs are jail enforcement programs that screen individuals for immigration-related violations as they are being booked into jail and while they are incarcerated; the NFOP and some 287(g) programs are task force programs that target at-large criminal aliens. This report describes how these programs work and identifies their common features and key differences among them. While consensus exists on the overarching goal to identify and remove serious criminal aliens, these programs have generated controversy, particularly Secure Communities and the 287(g) program. On one hand, the Obama Administration and other supporters of jail enforcement programs see them as efficient and even-handed ways to identify criminal aliens. The Administration has taken steps to strengthen and expand Secure Communities and plans to implement the program in every law enforcement jurisdiction in the country by the end of 2013. On the other hand, some lawmakers and advocacy groups have raised concerns that Secure Communities and the 287(g) program have not been narrowly targeted at serious criminal offenders and that the programs may have adverse impacts on police-community relations, may result in racial profiling, and may result in the detention of people who have not been convicted of criminal offenses and/or may not be subject to removal. Disagreements about the merits of jail enforcement programs overlap with a separate set of questions about the role of states and localities in immigration enforcement. These jurisdictional questions have focused in particular on Secure Communities, in part because the Obama Administration initially appeared to present it as a discretionary program but now takes the position that states and localities may not opt out of Secure Communities. Legislative issues related to Secure Communities and other ICE programs that Congress may consider include clarifying the role of state and local law enforcement agencies in immigration enforcement, the Obama Administration s exercise of prosecutorial discretion, mandating new data collection in response to concerns over racial profiling at the state and local levels, and clarifying the statutory authority for states and localities to detain unauthorized aliens.