Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 53 new people
  • 160 new organizations
  • 350 job history records for people in our database
  • 66 education records for people in our database
  • 96 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 5 new people through the revolving door
  • 60 new policy reports
  • 28 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 97 new personal financial disclosures
  • 49605 new tweets
  • 7567 new press releases
 LegiStorm Blog
 SOCIAL MEDIA

 DEVBLOG
 IN THE NEWS
Few rules when foreign governments fund Congressional travel

by FOX 13 / WTVT-TV on 05/10/2013

Lawmakers' families bring home big perks

by Iowa Watchdog on 05/08/2013

Paying the Bills | Hill Navigator

by Roll Call on 05/07/2013

LegiStorm: Most new lawmakers want D.C. experience

by Planet Washington on 04/29/2013

RECOVER: A Potentially Useful Technology for Nuclear Safeguards, but Greater International Commitment Is Needed - GAO Report

Date: Jan. 25, 1983
Report No.: ID-83-9
Pages: 62
  Download  PDF Download PDF Now
Summary:

GAO reported on the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency's (ACDA) Remote Continual Verification (RECOVER) system which is being developed to help the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) better use its inspectors. The RECOVER system would remotely monitor the operational status of surveillance cameras and containment devices.

GAO stated that the potential benefits of RECOVER for international safeguards are still uncertain. Although it is intended to improve IAEA efficiency and effectiveness, how and to what degree these goals would be achieved has not been determined. An initial report indicated that RECOVER would be potentially cost effective at only a small percentage of installations. IAEA believes that RECOVER may enhance the credibility of safeguards but that it will not reduce routine inspections. At present, the involved parties do not have the basic information necessary to make an informed decision on RECOVER benefits. In addition, potential legal and political obstacles to its routine use remain unexamined. The RECOVER project is having difficulty making the transition from research and development to implementation. The program has fallen 2 to 3 years behind schedule, and milestones for the integration of RECOVER into international nuclear safeguards procedures have been missed. The delays are partially due to the ACDA lack of resources, including a shortage of technical staff. There is general agreement that no insurmountable technical barriers block the use of RECOVER, but significant additional technical development is necessary before RECOVER could be used routinely for international safeguards. Uncertainties also continue concerning the likely cost of implementing the system because the eventual size of such a system is unknown and existing cost estimates for components are outdated and incomplete.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports