Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 53 new people
  • 160 new organizations
  • 350 job history records for people in our database
  • 66 education records for people in our database
  • 96 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 5 new people through the revolving door
  • 60 new policy reports
  • 28 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 97 new personal financial disclosures
  • 49605 new tweets
  • 7567 new press releases
 LegiStorm Blog
 SOCIAL MEDIA

 DEVBLOG
 IN THE NEWS
Few rules when foreign governments fund Congressional travel

by FOX 13 / WTVT-TV on 05/10/2013

Lawmakers' families bring home big perks

by Iowa Watchdog on 05/08/2013

Paying the Bills | Hill Navigator

by Roll Call on 05/07/2013

LegiStorm: Most new lawmakers want D.C. experience

by Planet Washington on 04/29/2013

Nuclear Waste: Issues Affecting the Opening of DOE's Waste Isolation Pilot Plant - GAO Report

Date: July 21, 1995
Report No.: T-RCED-95-254
Pages: 10
  Download  PDF Download PDF Now
Summary:

The Department of Energy (DOE) originally expected that the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) (a geologic repository near Carlsbad, New Mexico, for the permanent disposal of transuranic nuclear waste such as tools, rags, paper and other material contaminated with long-lived radioactive elements), would be operational in 1988. DOE now expects that date to slip by at least 10 years. Pending legislation would transfer from the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to the Secretary of Energy the authority to determine if the facility complies with EPA's disposal regulations and establish the intention of Congress that the Secretary would make this determination by March 31, 1997, 9 months earlier than DOE currently expected to obtain a certificate of compliance from EPA's Administrator. GAO's current and previous reviews of WIPP have found that while compliance with environmental regulations is key to the opening of the facility, DOE has contributed to the delay through its early emphasis on construction and then on performing unnecessary tests with transuranic waste at the expense of attention to environmental compliance issues. Transferring the primary responsibility for certifying compliance with disposal standards to DOE might not shorten the resolution of the compliance issue if the transfer undermined public confidence in the decision. Finally, achieving the legislative objective of a decision on compliance with disposal standards in March 1997 would not necessarily ensure that WIPP opens then. Other elements of the disposal system need to be developed before waste can be processed and shipped to WIPP.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports