Weekly Updates

LegiStorm is constantly adding new information on the people, places and reports in our database. In the past week, LegiStorm added:

  • 49 new people
  • 158 new organizations
  • 357 job history records for people in our database
  • 93 education records for people in our database
  • 127 contact addresses, emails and URLs (LinkedIn, Facebook, etc.)
  • 6 new people through the revolving door
  • 41 new policy reports
  • 67 new trips to our privately funded travel database
  • 97 new personal financial disclosures
  • 50733 new tweets
  • 7523 new press releases
 LegiStorm Blog
 SOCIAL MEDIA

 DEVBLOG
 IN THE NEWS
Few rules when foreign governments fund Congressional travel

by FOX 13 / WTVT-TV on 05/10/2013

Lawmakers' families bring home big perks

by Iowa Watchdog on 05/08/2013

Paying the Bills | Hill Navigator

by Roll Call on 05/07/2013

LegiStorm: Most new lawmakers want D.C. experience

by Planet Washington on 04/29/2013

Nuclear Waste Cleanup: DOE's Paducah Plan Faces Uncertainties and Excludes Costly Cleanup Activities - GAO Report

Date: April 28, 2000
Report No.: RCED-00-96
Pages: 50
  Download  PDF Download PDF Now
Summary:

In 1988, radioactive contamination was found in the drinking wells of homes near the government's uranium enrichment plant in Paducah, Kentucky. In response, the Department of Energy (DOE) connected local residences to municipal water supplies and began a cleanup program to identify and remove contamination in the groundwater, surface water, and soils located within and outside the plant's boundaries. Sources of the hazardous chemical and radioactive contamination included spills, leaks from contaminated buildings, buried waste, scrap yards, and waste lagoons. From 1988 through 1999, DOE spent about $388 million on these cleanup efforts. GAO found that the Department's plan for addressing the contamination at Paducah focuses on six major cleanup categories. Four of these address the physical contamination at the site: groundwater; surface water (for example, in ditches and creeks); soils; and buried waste. Two other major categories of cleanup work include treating and disposing of the equivalent of about 52,000 barrels of waste now stored on site and decontaminating and removing the two unused, contaminated uranium process building. DOE faces many challenges to completing its cleanup as planned. Uncertainties about the extent, source, and nature of contamination yet to be cleaned up could affect the cleanup plan; the outcome of such uncertainties could increase the cleanup costs. DOE also faces several technical risks, including the planned use of technologies that are unproven or perhaps not well suited to the site's conditions. Also underpinning the plan are assumptions that annual federal funding will rise to an average of $124 million through 2010. If the expected increase in funding does not occur, the project could take longer to complete. Even when the planned cleanup has been carried out, billions of dollars and many years will be needed to address areas at the Paducah site that are not in the cleanup plan. These areas include (1) large amounts of waste and scrap metals, (2) various unused buildings and structures, (3) thousands of tons of depleted uranium, and (4) the buildings and equipment that are now being used in the enrichment process but that will have to be cleaned up when the plant closes.

« Return to search Government Accountability Office reports