11/15/10 2:39 PM
Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
On motion to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution Agreed to by voice vote.
11/15/10 2:23 PM
DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H. Res. 1712.
Considered under suspension of the rules.
Mr. Conyers moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution.
The Speaker announced that votes on suspensions, if ordered, will be postponed until 6:00 p.m. today.
11/15/10 2:15 PM
H.R. 3808:
to require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce
11/15/10 2:15 PM
ONE MINUTE SPEECHES - The House proceeded with one minute speeches.
11/15/10 2:14 PM
VETO MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT - The Chair laid before the House the veto message from the President on H.R. 3808. The objections of the President were spread at large upon the Journal, and the veto message was ordered to be printed as a House Document No. 111-152. Pursuant to the order of the House of earlier today, further consideration of the veto message and the bill are postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010, and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion.
11/15/10 2:13 PM
The House received a message from the Clerk. Pursuant to the permission granted in Clause 2(h) of Rule II of the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, the Clerk transmitted H.R. 3808, the "Interstate Recognition of Notarization Act of 2010," and a Memorandum of Disapproval thereon received from the White House on October 8, 2010, at 12:55 p.m.
Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when the House adjourns on Monday, November 15, 2010, it adjourn to meet at 12:30 p.m. on Tuesday, November 16, 2010, for Morning-Hour Debate. Agreed to without objection.
Mr. Scott (VA) asked unanimous consent That, when a veto message on H.R. 3808 is laid before the House on the legislative day of today, then after the message is read and the objections of the President are spread at large upon the Journal, further consideration of the veto message and the bill shall be postponed until the legislative day of Wednesday, Nov. 17, 2010; and that on that legislative day, the House shall proceed to the constitutional question of reconsideration and dispose of such question without intervening motion. Agreed to without objection.
11/15/10 2:09 PM
The House received a communication from the Honorable Ted Poe. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Poe notified the House that he had received a subpoena for documents issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he would make the determination required by the Rule.
11/15/10 2:08 PM
The House received a communication from Cathie DeFazio, District Office Casework Manager, Rep. Boccieri. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ms. DeFazio notified the House that she had been served with a subpoena for deposition testimony and documents issued by the Court of Common Pleas, Stark County, Ohio, in connection with a domestic relations case now pending before that court and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, she would make the determination required by the Rule.
The House received a communication from Ameria Fowler, Casework Assistant, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ms. Fowler notified the House that she had received a criminal trial subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, she would make the determination required by the Rule.
The House received a communication from Kathryn Jean Arts, District Office Manager, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ms. Arts notified the House that she had received a criminal trial subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, she would make the determination required by the Rule.
11/15/10 2:07 PM
The House received a communication from Danielle Costantini, Constituent Services Director, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Ms. Costantini notified the House that she had received a criminal trial subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, she would make the determination required by the Rule.
The House received a communication from Charles Ross Branch, Field Representative, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Branch notified the House that he had received a criminal trial subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he would make the determination required by the Rule.
11/15/10 2:06 PM
The House received a communication from Norman Gonzales, Community Outreach Director, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Gonzales notified the House that he had received a subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he would make the determination required by the Rule.
The House received a communication from Rocky Deal, District Director, Rep. McClintock. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Deal notified the House that he had received a criminal trial subpoena for witness testimony, issued by the State of California, Placer County, Superior Court, and that after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he would make the determination required by the Rule.
