Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
» Get LegiStorm App
» Get LegiStorm Pro Free Demo

Multiyear Procurement (MYP) and Block Buy Contracting in Defense Acquisition: Background and Issues for Congress (CRS Report for Congress)

Premium   Purchase PDF for $24.95 (42 pages)
add to cart or subscribe for unlimited access
Release Date Revised April 29, 2024
Report Number R41909
Report Type Report
Authors Ronald O'Rourke; Moshe Schwartz
Source Agency Congressional Research Service
Older Revisions
  • Premium   Revised April 25, 2024 (41 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 20, 2023 (40 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 17, 2023 (37 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 22, 2023 (31 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 16, 2023 (30 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 30, 2023 (30 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 21, 2022 (52 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 20, 2022 (51 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 18, 2022 (40 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 27, 2022 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 24, 2022 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 25, 2022 (31 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 19, 2022 (31 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 4, 2022 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 31, 2022 (46 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 9, 2021 (44 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 19, 2021 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 28, 2021 (37 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 14, 2021 (32 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 29, 2021 (30 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 8, 2021 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Feb. 25, 2021 (44 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 22, 2020 (43 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 9, 2020 (42 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 10, 2020 (36 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 15, 2020 (35 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 28, 2020 (34 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 23, 2020 (33 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 24, 2020 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 14, 2020 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 17, 2020 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 17, 2019 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 12, 2019 (38 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 16, 2019 (36 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 21, 2019 (33 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 17, 2019 (31 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 6, 2019 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 30, 2019 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 19, 2018 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 9, 2018 (39 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 31, 2018 (38 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 5, 2018 (36 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 1, 2018 (38 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 18, 2018 (30 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 23, 2018 (40 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 5, 2017 (40 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 22, 2017 (37 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 12, 2017 (34 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 2, 2017 (34 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 8, 2017 (34 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 16, 2017 (29 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 2, 2017 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 12, 2017 (37 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 16, 2017 (37 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 25, 2016 (34 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 27, 2016 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 25, 2016 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 23, 2016 (19 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 6, 2015 (29 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 12, 2015 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 9, 2015 (25 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 4, 2015 (19 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised July 30, 2014 (31 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 25, 2014 (25 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised May 20, 2014 (25 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 1, 2014 (21 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Feb. 7, 2014 (28 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 29, 2013 (29 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 26, 2013 (26 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised April 25, 2013 (21 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 20, 2012 (23 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Aug. 9, 2012 (23 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 27, 2012 (23 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised June 13, 2012 (22 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised March 21, 2012 (19 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Dec. 21, 2011 (29 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Nov. 30, 2011 (27 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Oct. 11, 2011 (25 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   Revised Sept. 23, 2011 (25 pages, $24.95) add
  • Premium   July 11, 2011 (23 pages, $24.95) add
Summary:

Multiyear procurement (MYP) and block buy contracting (BBC) are special contracting mechanisms that Congress permits the Department of Defense (DOD) to use for a limited number of defense acquisition programs. Compared to the standard or default approach of annual contracting, MYP and BBC have the potential for reducing weapon procurement costs by several percent. Under annual contracting, DOD uses one or more contracts for each year’s worth of procurement of a given kind of item. Under MYP, DOD instead uses a single contract for two to five years’ worth of procurement of a given kind of item without having to exercise a contract option for each year after the first year. DOD needs congressional approval for each use of MYP. There is a permanent statute governing MYP contracting—10 U.S.C. 2306b. Under this statute, a program must meet several criteria to qualify for MYP. Compared with estimated costs under annual contracting, estimated savings for programs being proposed for MYP have ranged from less than 5% to more than 15%, depending on the particulars of the program in question, with many estimates falling in the range of 5% to 10%. In practice, actual savings from using MYP rather than annual contracting can be difficult to observe or verify because of cost growth during the execution of the contract due to changes in the program independent of the use of MYP rather than annual contracting. BBC is similar to MYP in that it permits DOD to use a single contract for more than one year’s worth of procurement of a given kind of item without having to exercise a contract option for each year after the first year. BBC is also similar to MYP in that DOD needs congressional approval for each use of BBC. BBC differs from MYP in the following ways:  There is no permanent statute governing the use of BBC.  There is no requirement that BBC be approved in both a DOD appropriations act and an act other than a DOD appropriations act.  Programs being considered for BBC do not need to meet any legal criteria to qualify for BBC, because there is no permanent statute governing the use of BBC that establishes such criteria.  A BBC contract can cover more than five years of planned procurements.  Economic order quantity (EOQ) authority—the authority to bring forward selected key components of the items to be procured under the contract and purchase the components in batch form during the first year or two of the contract—does not come automatically as part of BBC authority because there is no permanent statute governing the use of BBC that includes EOQ authority as an automatic feature.  BBC contracts are less likely to include cancellation penalties. Potential issues for Congress concerning MYP and BBC include whether to use MYP and BBC in the future more frequently, less frequently, or about as frequently as they are currently used; whether to create a permanent statute to govern the use of BBC, analogous to the permanent statute that governs the use of MYP; and whether the Coast Guard should begin making use of MYP and BBC.