Menu Search Account

LegiStorm

Get LegiStorm App Visit Product Demo Website
Legistorm Pro
Checkout »
» Get LegiStorm App
» Legistorm Pro. Checkout

House Floor Ticker Archive

09/24/15 1:08 PM H. Res. 434

Mr. Katko moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution. H. Res. 434 — "Providing for the concurrence by the House in the Senate amendment to H.R. 719, with an amendment."

09/24/15 1:08 PM H. Res. 434

Mr. Katko moved to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution. H. Res. 434 — "The title of this measure is not available."

09/24/15 1:06 PM

The Speaker announced that votes on suspensions, if ordered, will be postponed until a time to be announced.

09/24/15 1:05 PM

PRINTING OF PROCEEDINGS IN RECORD - Mr. Katko asked unanimous consent that the proceedings had during the recess be printed in the Congressional Record of today. Agreed to without objection.

09/24/15 1:04 PM

The House received a communication from the Honorable Elijah Cummings. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Cummings notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters and after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he had determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and further, that he intended to move to quash the subpoena, or for other protective relief.

09/24/15 1:04 PM

The House received a communication from the Honorable Elijah Cummings. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Cummings notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters and after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he had determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and f

09/24/15 1:03 PM

The House received a communication from the Honorable Jason Chaffetz. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Chaffetz notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters and after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he had determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and further, that he intended to move to quash the subpoena, or for other protective relief.

09/24/15 1:03 PM

The House received a communication from the Honorable Jason Chaffetz. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. Chaffetz notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters and after consultation with the Office of General Counsel, he had determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and f

09/24/15 1:02 PM

The House received a communication from tean McLaughlin, Majority Staff Director, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. McLaughlin notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he be directed to produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters. After consultation with the Office of General Counsel, it had been determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a "proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and, accordingly, he would move to quash the subpoena, or for other protective relief.

09/24/15 1:02 PM

The House received a communication from Sean McLaughlin, Majority Staff Director, Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. Pursuant to Rule VIII of the Rules of the House of Representatives, Mr. McLaughlin notified the House that he had received a subpoena, issued by the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, purporting to require that, in connection with a particular criminal case, he be directed to produce certain official documents and appear to testify at trial on official matters. After consultation with the Office of General Counsel, it had been determined, pursuant to Rule VIII, that the subpoena (i) is not a "proper exercise of jurisdiction by the court," (ii) seeks information that is not "material and relevant," and/or (iii) is not "consistent with the privileges and rights" of the House, its Members, its officers, or its employees and, accordingly, he would move to quash the subpoena, or for other protective relief.

« Return Ticker Archive